Kesejahteraan, Motivasi, dan Inovasi: Peran Mediasi Motivation to Learn dalam Hubungan Well-Being Oriented Management dan Innovative Work Behavior

Aloysia Desy Pramusiwi; Tegar Satya Putra

doi:10.33476/jobs.v4i2.3976

Authors

Aloysia Desy Pramusiwi Fakultas Bisnis dan Ekonomika, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
Tegar Satya Putra Fakultas Bisnis dan Ekonomika, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3594-6165

https://doi.org/10.33476/jobs.v4i2.3976

Keywords:

Well-being Oriented Management, Motivation to Learn, Innovative Work Behavior

Abstract

Studi ini bertujuan untuk meneliti bagaimana Well-being Oriented Management (WOM) dapat mendorong inovasi karyawan. Belum banyak literatur yang mengkaji inovasi sebagai sebuah tuntutan pekerjaan yang menyita sumber daya pegawai. Maka dari itu, penelitian ini menilik hubungan antara WOM, salah satu pendekatan pengelolaan karyawan yang mengdepankan kesejahteraan, Motivation To Learn (MTL) dan Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) menggunakan metode kuantitatif. Kuesioner didistribusikan kepada 150 responden dan dianalisis menggunakan SEM-PLS. Temuan menyoroti bahwa WOM berdampak positif pada MTL, yang pada gilirannya meningkatkan IWB. Selain itu, MTL berperan sebagai mediator parsial antara WOM dan IWB. Secara singkat, studi ini menunjukkan pentingnya WOM dalam mendorong inovasi karyawan. Manajer disarankan mengadopsi praktik tersebut untuk mendukung karyawan dalam berinovasi dan memastikan kesejahteraan mereka terpenuhi, mengingat inovasi adalah suatu kegiatan yang menantang.

References

Afsar, B., & Umrani, W. A. (2020a). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of motivation to learn, task complexity and innovation climate. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(3), 402–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0257

Afsar, B., & Umrani, W. A. (2020b). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of motivation to learn, task complexity and innovation climate. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(3), 402–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0257

AlEssa, H. S., & Durugbo, C. M. (2021). Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions. In Management Review Quarterly (Issue 0123456789). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00224-x

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Berber, N., & Lekovic, B. (2018). The impact of HR development on innovative performances in central and eastern European countries. Employee Relations, 40(5), 762–786. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-08-2017-0188

de Jong, J. P. J., & Kemp, R. (2003). Determinants of Co-Workers’ Innovative Behaviour: An Investigation into Knowledge Intensive Services. International Journal of Innovation Management, 07(02), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919603000787

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Autonomy and Need Satisfaction in Close Relationships: Relationships Motivation Theory. In Human Motivation and Interpersonal Relationships (pp. 53–73). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_3

Dixit, A., & Upadhyay, Y. (2021). Role of JD-R model in upticking innovative work behaviour among higher education faculty. RAUSP Management Journal, 56(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-03-2020-0060

Gong, Y. (2010). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 24(2), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo.2010.08124bad.003

Hair, J. F., Ringler, H., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Third Edition (3rd ed.). Sage Publisher.

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Salas-Vallina, A., Pozo, M., & Fernandez-Guerrero, R. (2020a). New times for HRM? Well-being oriented management (WOM), harmonious work passion and innovative work behavior. Employee Relations, 42(3), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2019-0185

Salas-Vallina, A., Pozo, M., & Fernandez-Guerrero, R. (2020b). New times for HRM? Well-being oriented management (WOM), harmonious work passion and innovative work behavior. Employee Relations, 42(3), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2019-0185

Yu, M. C., Zheng, X. T., Wang, G. G., Dai, Y., & Yan, B. (2018). When does motivation to learn reduce innovative behavior? An examination of mediated-moderation model. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(4), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-09-2017-0279