Ariel Nian Gani


Pengusaha menyesuaikan penggunaan sistem kognitif mereka agar sesuai dengan karakteristik tugas keputusan yang mereka hadapi untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pengambilan keputusan. Namun, literatur tidak memiliki bukti mengenai peran kemampuan untuk mencocokkan sistem kognitif dengan pengambilan keputusan dalam hubungan antara karakteristik tugas keputusan kewirausahaan dan efektivitas pengambilan keputusan. Penelitian ini berpendapat bahwa penggunaan sistem kognitif tertentu dipengaruhi oleh efek dari karakteristik tugas keputusan dan dimoderasi oleh kehadiran kemampuan untuk mencocokkan sistem kognitif dengan pengambilan keputusan. Dalam penelitian ini, teoriteori tentang efektivitas pengambilan keputusan, karakteristik tugas keputusan, dan kemampuan mencocokkan sistem kognitif dengan pengambil keputusan ditinjau dan diintegrasikan. Kemudian, sebuah proposisi dan model teoritis yang komprehensif dikembangkan. Kontribusi teoritis utama dari model ini juga dibahas.


efektivitas pengambilan keputusan; tugas kewirausahaan; sistem pemrosesan informasi kognitif

Full Text:



Allinson, C. W., Chell, E., & Hayes, J. (2000). Intuition and entrepreneurial behaviour.

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 31-43.

Artinger, F., Petersen, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Weibler, J. (2015). Heuristics as adaptive

decision strategies in management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 33-52.

Baum, J. R., & Wally, S. (2003). Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic

Management Journal, 24(11), 1107-1129.

Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive (Vol. 11). Cambrige, MA: Harvard

University Press.

Baron, R.A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of

Management Review, 33(2), 328-340.

Blume, B. D., & Covin, J. G. (2011). Attributions to intuition in the venture founding process:

Do entrepreneurs actually use intuition or just say that they do? Journal of Business

Venturing, 26(1), 137-151.

Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in

large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of

Business Venturing, 12(1), 9-30.

Chu, P. C., & Spires, E. E. (2001). Does time constraint on users negate the efficacy of

decision support systems? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,

(2), 229-249.

Dane, E., Rockmann, K. W., & Pratt, M. G. (2012). When should I trust my gut? Linking

domain expertise to intuitive decision-making effectiveness. Organizational Behavior

and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), 187-194.

Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments.

Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52-73.

Epstein, S., Pacini, R., DenesRaj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitiveexperiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 71(2), 390-405.

Gibcus, P., Vermeulen, P. A. M., and Radulova, E. (2008), The decision-making

entrepreneur: A literature review, in Cur?eu, P.L. and Vermeulen P.A.M.

(Ed.), Entrepreneurial Strategic Decision?making: A Cognitive Perspective, Edward

Elgar, Northampton, MA, 11-40.

Groves, K., Vance, C. and Choi, D. (2011). Examining entrepreneurial cognition: an

occupational analysis of balanced linear and nonlinear thinking and entrepreneurship

success”, Journal of Small Business Management, 49(3), 438-466.

Gustafsson, V. (2006). Entrepreneurial decision-making: Individuals, tasks and cognitions.

Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1987). Direct comparison of the

efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Transactions

on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics, 17(5), 753-770.

Hough, J. R., & White, M. A. (2003). Environmental dynamism and strategic decisionmaking rationality: An examination at the decision level. Strategic Management

Journal, 24(5), 481-489.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow: Macmillan.

Kickul, J., Gundry, L.K., Barbosa, S.D. and Whitcanack, L. (2009). Intuition versus analysis?

Testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepreneurial self–efficacy and the

new venture creation process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 439-453.

Lipshitz, R., & Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making

analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 149-163.

Mullins, J. W., & Forlani, D. (2005). Missing the boat or sinking the boat: A study of new

venture decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 47-69.

Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational

Testing Services.

Novak, T.P. and Hoffman, D.L. (2008). The fit of thinking style and situation: new measures

of situation-specific experiential and rational cognition. Journal of Consumer

Research, 36(1), 56-72.

Palich, L. E., & Bagby, D. R. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risktaking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 425-

Sadler-Smith, E. (2004), Cognitive style and the management of small and medium-sized

enterprises. Organization Studies, 25(2), 155-181.

Sadler?Smith, E. (2012). Entrepreneurial cognition, entrepreneurial orientation and firm

capability in the creative industries. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 415-432.

Shepherd, D.A., Williams, T.A. and Patzelt, H. (2015). Thinking about entrepreneurial

decision making: review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 11-46.

Van Riel, A., Ouwersloot, H., & Lemmink, J. (2003). Antecedents of effective decision

making: A cognitive approach. METEOR, Maastricht research school of Economics of

TEchnology and ORganizations, 1-41.

Vermeulen, P.A.M. and Curseu, P.L. (2010). Entrepreneurial strategic decision-making: A

cognitive perspective, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA



  • There are currently no refbacks.

JOBS (Jurnal Orientasi Bisnis dan Entrepreneurship) journal is supported by :
YARSI University - Smart Campus That You Can Rely On
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.