Seberapa Berisiko Pesepeda di Jalan Raya? Studi Perilaku Pesepeda di DKI Jakarta

Arif Triman; Chandradewi Kusristanti

doi:10.33476/ms.v10i2.3798

Authors

Arif Triman Universitas YARSI
Chandradewi Kusristanti Universitas YARSI

https://doi.org/10.33476/ms.v10i2.3798

Keywords:

Cycling Behavior, risk perception, rule knowledge, distraction

Abstract

Bersepeda menjadi kegiatan yang paling populer dilakukan untuk berolahraga dan juga melepas kejenuhan. Selain memiliki dampak positif, peningkatan jumlah pengguna sepeda juga memiliki dampak negatif, salah satunya adalah kecelakaan. Kecelakaan ini bisa disebabkan oleh faktor eksternal seperti pengendara lain di jalan raya ataupun faktor internal seperti adanya eror, pelanggaran peraturan lalu lintas ataupun distraksi dijalan raya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji faktor-faktor yang berkorelasi dengan kecelakaan sepeda. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan kuesioner The Cycling Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ) (α = 0.7-0,85) dan Cyclist Risk Perception and Regulation Scale (CRPRS) (α = 0.68-0,77). Partisipan penelitian ini adalah 241 pesepeda di DKI Jakartayang diambil menggunakan teknik snowball sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa violation dan error berkorelasi negatif dengan risk perception dan self-reported rule knowledge. Lalu, positive behavior berkorelasi positif dengan risk perception dan dan self-reported rule knowledge serta berkorelasi negatif dengan distraction. Berdasarkan hasil ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa perilaku bersepeda yang aman akan berkaitan dengan seberapa banyak distraksi yang mengganggu konsentrasi pesepeda dan tingkat persepsi pesepeda terhadap suatu risiko. Selain itu, pengetahuan tentang peraturan bersepeda d jalan raya juga memiliki keterkaitan dengan perilaku berisiko pada pesepeda di jalan raya.

References

Budi DR, Widyaningsih R, Nur L, Agustan B, Dwi DRAS, Qohhar W, & Asnaldi A 2021. Cycling during covid-19 pandemic: Sports or lifestyle? International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9(4), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2021.090422

Dinh DD, Vũ NH, McIlroy RC, Plant KA, & Stanton NA 2020. Effect of attitudes towards traffic safety and risk perceptions on pedestrian behaviours in Vietnam. IATSS Research, 44(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.01.002

Fitroni H, Wibowo S, & Sulistyarto S 2021. Minat masyarakat dalam menggunakan sepeda lipat untuk olahraga rekreasi di kota Surabaya. Media Ilmu Keolahragaan Indonesia, 11, 2021. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/mikiTerakreditasiSINTA4

Genshow J, Sturzbecher D, & Willmes-Lenz GE 2014. Novice driver preparation – an international comparison Novice driver preparation – an international comparison.

Hassen A, Godesso A, Abebe L, & Girma E 2011. Risky driving behaviors for road traffic accident among drivers in Mekele city, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes, 4, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-535

Institute for Transportation and Development Policy 2020. During coronavirus, Jakarta’s cycling grows as does police backlash. https://www.itdp.org/2020/07/10/during-coronavirus-cycling-grows-as-does-police-backlash

Jakarta Rendah Emisi 2021. Infrastruktur bersepeda - Jakarta rendah emisi. https://rendahemisi.jakarta.go.id/action/detail/18/infrastruktur-bersepeda

Kumar R 2011. Research methodology. Kota penerbit? : Sage Publications.

Kummeneje AM, & Rundmo T 2020. Attitudes, risk perception and risk-taking behaviour among regular cyclists in Norway. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 69, 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.007

Rahadiansyah R 2020. Kecelakaan pesepeda meningkat saat pandemi. https://oto.detik.com/berita/d-5092499/kecelakaan-pesepeda-meningkat-saat-pandemi

Rogers GO 1997. The dynamics of risk perception: How does perceived risk respond to risk events? Risk Analysis, 17(6), 745–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb01280.x

Rolison JJ, Regev S, Moutari S, & Feeney A 2018. What are the factors that contribute to road accidents? An assessment of law enforcement views, ordinary drivers’ opinions, and road accident records. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 115(February), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.025

Romero DL, De Barros DM, Belizario GO, & De Pádua Serafim A 2019. Personality traits and risky behavior among motorcyclists: An exploratory study. PLoS ONE, 14(12), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225949

Shang WL, Chen J, Bi H, Sui Y, Chen Y, & Yu H 2021. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on user behaviors and environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big-data analysis. Applied Energy, 285(December 2020), 116429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116429

Terzano K 2013. Bicycling safety and distracted behavior in the Hague, the Netherlands. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 57, 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.007

Triman A, & Bagaskara S 2017. Peran trait kepribadian terhadap perilaku mengemudi (The role of personality trait to the driving behavior in motorcycle rider in Jakarta). Jurnal Psikogenesis, 5(2), 150–158.

Useche SA, Alonso F, Montoro L & Esteban C 2018. Distraction of cyclists: How does it influence their risky behaviors and traffic crashes? PeerJ, 2018(9). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5616

Useche SA, Alonso F, Montoro L, & Esteban C 2019. Explaining self-reported traffic crashes of cyclists: An empirical study based on age and road risky behaviors. Safety Science, 113(January 2018), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.11.021

Useche SA, Philippot P, Ampe T, Llamazares J, & de Geus B 2021. “Pédaler en toute sécurité”: The Cycling Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ) in Belgium – A validation study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 80, 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.014