Predicting Santri Engagement by Attachment to Caregiver
Kata Kunci:
attachment to caregiver, engagement, santriAbstrak
Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi hubungan prediktif antara engagement santri (siswa di pesantren) dan attachment mereka dengan pengasuh. Dengan menggunakan sampel 99 santri (65 laki-laki dan 34 perempuan) dari sebuah pesantren untuk siswa berusia 10 hingga 20 tahun (M = 15,75, SD = 2,16), penelitian ini menggunakan pengambilan sampel yang mudah dilakukan dan analisis kuesioner yang canggih. Dengan menggunakan graded response model (GRM) untuk kalibrasi, penelitian ini secara tepat mengestimasi skor skala engagement dan attachment santri, yang kemudian dianalisis melalui regresi untuk menguji kapasitas prediksi attachment pada pengasuh terhadap engagement santri. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya hubungan yang signifikan (b = 0.43, p <0.01) menekankan pentingnya attachment pada pengasuh dalam memprediksi engagement santri dalam konteks pesantren. Penerapan GRM meningkatkan ketepatan penskalaan attachment dan engagement. Hal ini memperkuat validitas analisis regresi, mengkonfirmasi hipotesis bahwa attachment dengan pengasuh dapat memprediksi engagement santri di lingkungan pesantren.
Referensi
Agustina, F. R., & Rusmawati, D. (2022). Hubungan antara Efikasi Diri dengan Student Engagement pada Santri di Pondok Pesantren Mahasiswa Bina Khoirul Insan Semarang. Jurnal EMPATI, 11(5), 332-336. https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.0.36741
Ahmed, U., Umrani, W. A., Qureshi, M. A., & Samad, A. (2018). Examining the links between teachers support, academic efficacy, academic resilience, and student engagement in Bahrain. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(9), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.09.008
Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(5), 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02202939
Azmi, I. N. (2024). Hubungan Stres Akademik dengan Student Engagement Pondok Pesantren di Kota Bandung. Bandung Conference Series: Psychology Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsps.v4i1.10008
Bumbacco, C., & Scharfe, E. (2020). Why Attachment Matters: First-Year Post-secondary Students’ Experience of Burnout, Disengagement, and Drop-Out. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 24(4), 988-1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025120961012
Byrne, Z., Albert, L., Manning, S., & Desir, R. (2017). Relational models and engagement: an attachment theory perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2016-0006
Charteris, J., & Page, A. (2021). School Bonding, Attachment, and Engagement through Remote Learning: Fostering School Connectedness. New Zealand Journal of Teachers' Work, 18(2), 91-108.
Fachmi, T. (2022). Pengaruh Self-Efficacy terhadap School Engagement Santri Pondok Pesantren. Geneologi PAI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.32678/geneologipai.v9i1
Ferrando, P. J., & Navarro-González, D. (2021). A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Model for Continuous and Graded Responses With Error in Persons and Items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(6), 1029-1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164421998412
Gallarin, M., & Alonso-Arbiol, I. (2013). Dimensionality of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Evaluation with the Spanish Version. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, E55, Article E55. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.47
García-Rodríguez, L., Iriarte Redín, C., & Reparaz Abaitua, C. (2023). Teacher-student attachment relationship, variables associated, and measurement: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 38, 100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100488
Hart, J., Nailling, E., Bizer, G. Y., & Collins, C. K. (2015). Attachment theory as a framework for explaining engagement with Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.016
Havik, T., & Westergård, E. (2020). Do Teachers Matter? Students’ Perceptions of Classroom Interactions and Student Engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 488-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1577754
Hefner, R. W. (2011). Civil islam: Muslims and democratization in indonesia. Princeton University Press.
Humphreys, J. (2020). Maternal and Teacher Attachment as Predictors of Student Engagement. Psychology of Education Review, 44(2), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsper.2020.44.2.3
Karim, A., Fathurrohman, O., Muhammadun, Saripudin, W., Rahmat, D., & Mansir, F. (2023). Altruistic works, religion, and corruption: Kiais’ leadership to shape anti-corruption values in pesantren. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2238968. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2238968
Li, M., Zheng, Y., Xie, Y., & Li, X. (2023). Friendship quality and positive emotional adjustment among boarding adolescents: roles of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04802-y
Lukens-Bull, R. (2010). Madrasa by Any Other Name: Pondok, Pesantren, and Islamic Schools in Indonesia and Larger Southeast Asian Region. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 4(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2010.4.1.1-21
Martin, A. J., Papworth, B., Ginns, P., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2016). Motivation, engagement, and social climate: An international study of boarding schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(6), 772-787. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000086
Martinez-Fuentes, S., Jager, J., & Umaña-Taylor, A. J. (2021). The mediation process between Latino youths’ family ethnic socialization, ethnic–racial identity, and academic engagement: Moderation by ethnic–racial discrimination? Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 27(2), 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000349
McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2020). Thinking twice about sum scores. Behavior Research Methods, 52(6), 2287-2305. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01398-0
Nkomo, L. M., Daniel, B. K., & Butson, R. J. (2021). Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: a systematic review of the literature [Article]. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1
Pinquart, M. (2023). Attachment Security with Mothers and Fathers: A Meta-Analysis on Mean-Level Differences and Correlations of Verbal Attachment Measures. Journal of Child and Family Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02585-1
Ridho, A. (2023). Work Engagement: A Conceptual Review [Keterikatan Kerja: Sebuah Reviu Konseptual]. Buletin Psikologi, 31(1), 56-79. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.55589
Ridho, A. (2024). Multidimensionality of student engagement construct: The exploratory and confirmatory item response model. Testing, Psychometric, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 31(1), xx-xx. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM31.1.1
Rohman, A., Muhtamiroh, S., Imron, A., & Miyono, N. (2023). Integrating traditional-modern education in madrasa to promote competitive graduates in the globalization era. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2268456. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2268456
Romano, L., Angelini, G., Consiglio, P., & Fiorilli, C. (2021). Academic Resilience and Engagement in High School Students: The Mediating Role of Perceived Teacher Emotional Support. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(2), 334-344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11020025
Roorda, D. L., Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2021). Don’t forget student-teacher dependency! A Meta-analysis on associations with students’ school adjustment and the moderating role of student and teacher characteristics. Attachment & Human Development, 23(5), 490-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2020.1751987
Salmela‐Aro, K., Tang, X., Symonds, J., & Upadyaya, K. (2021). Student Engagement in Adolescence: A Scoping Review of Longitudinal Studies 2010–2020. Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell), 31(2), 256-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12619
Samejima, F. (1997). Graded Response Model. In Handbook of Modern Item Response (pp. 85-100). Springer-Verlag.
Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students' engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 378-389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12340
Wang, M.-T., & Hofkens, T. L. (2020). Beyond Classroom Academics: A School-Wide and Multi-Contextual Perspective on Student Engagement in School. Adolescent Research Review, 5(4), 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00115-z
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Ali Ridho

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).