Hubungan Antara Identitas Organisasi Dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Di Industri Kreatif: Studi Pada Karyawan Perusahaan X
Authors
-
Hanan Maria Hatta
Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia
-
Endang Parahyanti
Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara identitas organisasi dan perilaku kerja inovatif pada perusahaan X. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada pesatnya perkembangan dari industri kreatif. Pendekatan yang sesuai dalam menghadapi hal tersebut adalah pendekatan inovatif yang dapat memicu diterapkannya perilaku kerja inovatif dalam organisasi. Salah satu hal yang dapat memiliki hubungan dengan perilaku kerja inovatif adalah identitas organisasi. Identitas organisasi sendiri memiliki peranan penting dalam memandu perilaku kayawan yang diharapkan muncul. Terdapat total 401 karyawan perusahaan X yang berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Perusahaan X merupakan perusahaan yang memiliki nilai inovatif dan bergerak dalam bidang industri kreatif dengan sub-kelompok penerbitan dan percetakan. Terdapat dua alat ukur yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Innovative Work Behavior Scale (Janssen, 2000) dan Organizational Identity Scale (Etikariena, 2015). Dengan menggunakan teknik analisis pearson product moment correlation, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ditemukan adanya hubungan yang signifikan antara identitas organisasi dan perilaku kerja inovatif (r= .063, p> .05).
Kata kunci: identitas organisasi, inovatif, industri kreatif
References
Arif, S., Zubair, A., & Manzoor, Y. (2012). Innovative Work Behavior and Communication
Climate among Employees of Advertising Agencies. National Institute of Psychology
Quaid-i-Azam, 65-72.
Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1996). Organizational Identity and Strategy as a Context or the
Individual. Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 19-44.
Darwis, Y. (2013). The Urgency of Communication Media (E-Commerce) in Indonesia’s
Creative Industry as an Effort to Increase International Business Competition: A
Case Study of the Fashion Industry. Andalas Univerity, Sumatera.
De Jong, J. P. J., & Hartog, D. N. D. (2008). Innovative work behavior Measurement and
validation. Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs, 1-27.
Dhalla, R. (2007). The Construction of Organizational Identity: Keys contributing External and Intra-Organizational Factor. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 245-260.
Dörner, N. (2012). Innovative work behavior: the roles of employee expectations And effects
on job performance. University of St.Gallen, Dissertation no. 4007.
Etikariena, A. (Not Published). (Disertasi). Peran Memori Organisasi, Identitas Organisasi, dan Kesiapan Karyawan Berinovasi Terhadap Perilaku kerja inovatif. Universitas
Indonesia, Depok.
Gawer, A., & Phillips, N. (2013). Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel’s
Transformation to Platform Leader. United Kingdom: Sage Publications.
Gioia, D., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000), “Organizational Identity, Image and Adaptive
Instabilityâ€. Academy of Management Review. 25 (1), 63-81.
Harris, T.E. (2002). Applied Organizational Communication: Principles and Pragmatics for Future Practice (2nd ed.). United States of America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Inc.
Hammond, M.M., Farr, J.L., Neff, N.L., Schwall, A.R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of
individual level of innovation at work: A meta analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics,
Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90-103.
Hoholm, T., & Strønen, F. (2011). Innovation, Strategy, and Identity: A Case Study From the
Food Industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(3), 345-363.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perception of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
Kanter, R. (1988), When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations, in Staw, B.M. and Cummings, L.L. (Eds).
Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
Kheng, Y, K., June, S., & Mahmood, R. (2013). The determinants of innovative work behavior in the knowledge intensive business services sector in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 9 (15), 47-58.
Leong, C., & Rasli, A., (2013). The Relationship Between Innovative Work Behavior on Work Role Performance: An Empirical Study. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 592-600.
Lin, Y. (2004). Organizational Identity and Its Implication on Organizational Development. University of Minnesota, USA.
Oukes, T. (2010). Innovative Work Behavior: A Case Study at a Tire Manufacturer. University of Twente, Netherland.
Moore, I. (2014). Culture and Creative Industries Concept – a Historical Perspective. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 738-746.
Moon, T. (2014). Mentoring the Next Generation for Innovation in Today’s Organization.
Journal of Strategic Leadership, 5(1), 23-35.
Parman, A., Subagiyo, Chairi, B., Erwidodo, Kresnarini, H, I., & Suseno, E. (2008). Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif Indonesia 2025. Indonesia : Departemen Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. Diakses dari http://dgi-indonesia.com/wp- content/uploads/2009/05/buku-1-rencana-pengembangan-ekonomi-kreatif-indonesia- 2009.pdf
Schermuly, C., Meyer B., & Dammer, L. (2013). Leader-Member Exchange and Innovative Behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(3), 132-142.
Scott, S.G., & Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3), 580- 607.
Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G.R. (2004). The effects of personal and and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here. Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958.
Tim Studi Ekonomi Kreatif, Kemenparekraf (2014). Artikel [on-line]. Diakses 15 Maret 2015 dari http://program.indonesiakreatif.net/research/kontribusi-ekonomi-kreatif- indonesia/
United Nation Confrence on Trade and Development. (2010). Creative Economy Report 2010. Diakses pada 2 April 2015 dari http://unctad.org/en/Docs/ditctab20103_en.pdf
Utami, L. D., & Lantu, D. C. (2014). Development competitiveness model for small medium enterprises among the creative industry in bandung. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 305-323.
Waenink, E. (2012). Creating innovation in employees, the effect of competences on innovative work behavior and the moderating role of human resources practices. (Master’s Thesis). Universiteit Twente, Enschede.
Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D., (2005). Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking.
Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421.
West, M.A., & Farr, J.L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological Perspectives. Social Behavior, 4, 15-30.
Whetten, D. (2006). Albert and Whetten: Strengthening the Concept of Organizational Identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 219-234.
Witting, M. (2006). Relations Between Organizational Identity, Identification, and Organizational Objectives: An Empirical Study in Municipalities. Universiteit Twente, Enschede.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
