IMPLIKASI ASAS KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK DALAM PRAKTEK PENGGUNAAN FORMAT-FORMAT KONTRAK

Abstract

One thing that is common in most of case files submitted to the court is the
ambiguously multi-interpretational contracts or the imbalanced positions of the parties
involved, which consequently results in dispute instead of sustainable harmony between
them. This research applies normative method which involves literature study and
related provisions of law. From the above explanation, it can be concluded that any
aspects related to legal contracts could potentially lead to dispute when none of the
involved parties has the willingness to anticipate it. In practice, moreover, physical
form of legal contract might spark particular conflicts. Government, in this regard
through relevant agencies, should play an active role in formulating clear, definitive
standard—including the one which regulates technical aspects—of legal contracts to
minimize potential conflicts or disputes in the future.