Validitas dan Reliabilitas Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) Online Computerized: Korelasi Skor WCST dengan Prestasi Akademik

Authors

  • Khalisha Fakhira Fakultas Psikologi Universitas YARSI
  • Sunu Bagaskara Fakultas Psikologi Universitas YARSI

https://doi.org/10.33476/knpk.v4i1.5275

Keywords:

Alat ukur, kriteria, mahasiswa Indonesia, split-half, WCST online computerized

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility (CF) merupakan salah satu inti dari suatu set perkembangan di otak yang disebut executive function. CF memiliki peran dalam mengubah perspektif untuk memecahkan suatu masalah secara fleksibel sesuai dengan tuntutan, aturan, maupun prioritas baru. CF memiliki keterkaitan yang erat dengan penyesuaian perilaku dalam perubahan lingkungan. Dalam pengukurannya digunakan tes neuropsikologi Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) yang dikembangkan oleh Berg dan Grant. Penelitian mengenai WCST di Indonesia masih belum banyak ditemukan, terutama berbasis online computerized. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui reliabilitas dan validitas Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) berbasis online computerized dalam mengukur cognitive flexibility (CF). Metode analisis validitas yang digunakan adalah uji validitas kireteria konkuren, melalui analisis korelasi antara skor kesalahan perseverasi pada WCST online computerized dengan Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif (IPK) partisipan. Analisis validitas menunjukkan bahwa terdapat korelasi positif, tetapi tidak signifikan antara skor perseverasi dan IPK, r = 0.133, p = 0.163. Sedangkan, hasil analisis reliabilitas split-half setelah menerapkan rumus Spearman-Brown untuk bagian awal/akhir r = 0.61 (p<0,01) dan ganjil/genap, r = 0.80, p <.001. Dari hasil tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa WCST online computerized reliabel, tetapi tidak valid dalam mengukur CF. Penelitian ini memberi tambahan pengetahuan terkait dengan WCST online computerized di Indonesia, serta menjadi langkah awal dalam perkembangan WCST berbasis online computerized dan bagi penilaian digital lebih lanjut terkait cognitive flexibility.

References

Adrian, K. (2020, 05 27). Terapkan Physical Distancing Saat Ini Juga! Alodokter., https://www.alodokter.com/terapkan-physical-distancing-saat-ini-juga. Berg, E. A. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology, 39(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159 Carone, D. A. (2007). E. Strauss, E. M. S. Sherman, & O. Spreen, A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(1), 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280701280502 Dajani, D. R., & Uddin, L. Q. (2015). Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience. Trends Neurosci, 38(9), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.003.Demystifying Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 Feenstra, H. E. M., Vermeulen, I. E., Murre, J. M. J., & Schagen, S. B. (2018). Online self-administered cognitive testing using the Amsterdam cognition scan: Establishing psychometric properties and normative data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.2196/JMIR.9298 Feldstein, S. N., Keller, F. R., Portman, R. E., Durham, R. L., Klebe, K. J., & Davis, H. P. (1999). A comparison of computerized and standard versions of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(3), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.13.3.303.1744 Fillit, H. M., Simon, E. S., Doniger, G. M., & Cummings, J. L. (2008). Practicality of a computerized system for cognitive assessment in the elderly. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 4(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2007.09.008 Fortuny, L. i A., & Heaton, R. K. (1996). Standard versus computerized administration of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10(4), 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049608406702

Fuiji D (2017). Conducting a culturally informed neuropsychological evaluation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(4), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059831 Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtis, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) manual, revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Ionescu, T. (2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.11.001

Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., Ashton, V. L., Johnson, L. G., & Gualtieri, C. T. (2009). Does familiarity with computers affect computerized neuropsychological test performance? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(5), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390802372125 Johnson, B. T. (2016). The relationship between cognitive flexibility, coping, and symptomatology in psychotherapy. Thesis. Kanadlı, S. (2016). A meta-analysis on the effect of instructional designs based on the learning styles models on academic achievement, attitude and retention. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 16(6), 2057–2086. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.6.0084 Kercood, S., Lineweaver, T., Frank, C., & Fromm, E. (2017). Cognitive flexibility and its relationship to academic achievement and career choice of college students with and without Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30(4), 329–344. Kohli, A., & Kaur, M. (2006). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Normative data and experience. Indian J Psychiatry, 48(3), 181–184. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.31582 Kopp, B., Maldonado, N., Scheffels, J. F., Hendel, M., & Lange, F. (2019). A meta-analysis of relationships between measures of Wisconsin Card Sorting and Intelligence. Brain Sciences, 9(12), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9120349 Kopp, B., Lange, F., & Steinke, A. (2021). The Reliability of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Clinical Practice. Assessment, 28(1), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119866257 Koski, L., Brouillette, M. J., Lalonde, R., Hello, B., Wong, E., Tsuchida, A., & Fellows, L. K. (2011). Computerized testing augments pencil-and-paper tasks in measuring HIV-associated mild cognitive impairment. HIV Medicine, 12(8), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2010.00910.x Kumar, R. (2018). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage. Liu, Y. M., Tsai, S. Y., Fleck, D. E., & Strakowski, S. M. (2011). Cross-cultural comparisons on Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Research, 189(3), 469–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.05.038 Metriana, M., & Lataruva, E. (2014). Studi komparatif pengaruh motivasi, perilaku belajar, self-efficacy dan status kerja terhadap prestasi akademik antara mahasiswa bekerja dan mahasiswa tidak bekerja (studi pada mahasiswa S1 Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro) (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis). Ord, J. (2007). Executive Dysfunction following Traumatic Brain Injury and Factors Related to Impairment. Paolo, A. M., Axelrod, B. N., Ryan, J. J., & Goldman, R. S. (1994). Administration accuracy of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8(1), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049408401549 Paolo, A. M., Tröster, A. I., Axelrod, B. N., & Koller, W. C. (1995). Construct validity of the WCST in normal elderly and persons with Parkinson’s disease. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10(5), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-6177(95)00052-6 Polin, J. (2021, Maret 29). Ngobrol bareng Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Indonesia, Pak Nadiem. IGTV. https://www.instagram.com/tv/CM_z8aTJ27_/ Polin, J (2021, Maret 2021). Ngobrol bareng Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Indonesia, Pak Nadiem [video]. IGTV. https://www.instagram.com/tv/CM_z8aTJ27_/ Steinke, A., Kopp, B., & Lange, F. (2021). The Wisconsin Card Sorting test: Split-half reliability estimates for a self-administered computerized variant. Brain Sciences, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11050529

Stoet, G. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24-31.

Tchanturia, K., Davies, H., Roberts, M., Harrison, A., Nakazato, M., Schmidt, U., Treasure, J., & Morris, R. (2012). Poor cognitive flexibility in eating disorders: Examining the evidence using the wisconsin card sorting task. PLoS ONE, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028331 Toraman, Ç., Özdemir, H. F., Aytug Kosan, A. M., & Orakci, S. (2020). Relationships between cognitive flexibility, perceived quality of faculty life, learning approaches, and academic achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1316a Tun, P. A., & Lachman, M. E. (2010). The association between computer use and cognition across adulthood: Use it so you won’t lose it? Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019543 Wortman, K. (2018). Personality and executive functioning in male veterans with mild traumatic brain injury. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 79(1-B(E)), No-Specified. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc15&NEWS=N&AN=2017-54456-155 Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100 Zulherma, Z., & Suryana, D. (2019). Peran Executive Function Brain Dalam Perkembangan Kemampuan Kognitif Anak Usia Dini Pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 3(2), 648–656.

Downloads

Published

21-02-2025

Issue

2021: Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Psikologi Kesehatan IV

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Khalisha Fakhira, Sunu Bagaskara

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.