Analisis Cost Efficiency Bank Umum di Indonesia Selama Pandemi Covid-19 Periode 2020-2022
https://doi.org/10.33476/jeba.v8i2.3920
Keywords:
Cost Efficiency, SFA, Principal Component Regression, BankingAbstract
The condition of the Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on the banking sector which caused a decline in bank performance in 2020 as indicated by a decrease in ROA of 35.63%, an increase in BOPO of 9.06%, and an increase in NPL of 20.95% (yoy). This study aims to estimate banking cost efficiency during economic conditions during the Covid-19 pandemic for the period 2020 – 2022. The sample of this study was 40 bank companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the study period. The research method used is stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to estimate the cost efficiency of a bank and principal component regression to estimate the determinant of a bank’s cost efficiency. It was found that the average cost efficiency of banks in Indonesia has increased every year by 0.720925 in 2020, 0.773875 in 2021 and 0.818744 in 2022 respectively. The factors that affects cost efficiency is NPL and LDR are significantly negative effect on cost efficiency, while ROA was significanly positive effect on cost efficiency. Based on the research results, it is hoped that banks can make adjustments to credit allowance reserves, streamline the number of human resources in collecting and recovery units related to credit management, and maximize the bank’s intermediation function.
References
Anwar, M. (2019). Cost efficiency performance of Indonesian banks over the recovery period: A stochastic frontier analysis. Social Science Journal, 56(3), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.08.002
Apriyana, A., Siregar, H., & Hasanah, H. (2015). Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Efisiensi Biaya Perbankan. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 14(3), 321–333.
Ariefanda, R. D. (2014). Analisis Efisiensi Bank Umum Di Indonesia Tahun 2008-2011 dengan Pendekatan Data Envelopment Analysis ( Dea ). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB.
Asaftei, G., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2008). Regulation and efficiency in transition: The case of Romanian banks. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 33(3), 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-007-9041-0
Aviliani, A., Siregar, H., Maulana, T. N. A., & Hasanah, H. (2015). The Impact of Macroeconomic Condition on The Banks Performance in Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 17(4), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v17i4.503
Bank Indonesia. n.d. Kurs Transaksi Bank Indonesia. Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/statistik/informasi-kurs/transaksi-bi/default.aspx
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Pertumbuhan-Ekonomi-Indonesia-Triwulan-IV-2020-ind. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/website/images/Pertumbuhan-Ekonomi-Indonesia-Triwulan-IV-2020-ind.jpg
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(2), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.016
Berger, A. N., & Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking and Finance, 21(7), 895–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00010-1
Chollet, F. (2017). Machine learning. Machine Learning, 45(13), 40–48. https://books.google.ca/books?id=EoYBngEACAAJ&dq=mitchell+machine+learning+1997&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiomdqfj8TkAhWGslkKHRCbAtoQ6AEIKjAA
Coxe, K. L. (2014). Principal Components Regression Analysis. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat02495
Darmawan, D. P. (2016). Pengukuran Efisiensi Produktif Menggunakan Pendekatan Stochastic Frontier. Elmatera, 1–123.
Endri. (2015). Variabel Makroekonomi Dan Efisiensi Perbankan Di Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Akuntansi, 73–80.
Farel, M. J. (1957). the Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5rdxd5.7
Fries, S., & Taci, A. (2005). Cost efficiency of banks in transition: Evidence from 289 banks in 15 post-communist countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29(1 SPEC. ISS.), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.016
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2015). Dasar-dasar Ekonometrika (5th-buku 1 ed.). Salemba Empat.
Gunes, H., & Yildirim, D. (2016). Estimating cost efficiency of Turkish commercial banks under unobserved heterogeneity with stochastic frontier models. Central Bank Review, 16(4), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2016.12.001
Hadad, M. D., Santoso, W., Mardanugraha, E., & Illyas, D. (2003). Pendekatan Parametrik untuk Efisiensi Perbankan Indonesia. Bank Indonesia, 1–27. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/perbankan-dan-stabilitas/riset/Pages/Pendekatan parametrik untuk efisiensi Perbankan Indonesia.aspx
Jolliffe, P. M. (2019). Introduction. Prisons and Forced Labour in Japan, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351206358-1
Kasmir. (2014). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (1st, Cetakan ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Koetter, M. (2006). Measurement matters-alternative input price proxies for bank efficiency analyses. Journal of Financial Services Research, 30(2), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-006-0018-4
Laksmono R, D., Suhaedi, S., Kusmiarso, B., I, A., Pramono, B., Hutapea, E. G., & Pambudi, S. (2003). Suku Bunga Sebagai Salah Satu Indikator Ekspektasi Inflasi. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 2(4), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v2i4.283
Marsondang, A., Purwanto, B., & Mulyati, H. (2019). Pengukuran Efisiensi Serta Analisis Faktor Internal dan Eksternal Bank yang Memengaruhinya Measurement of Efficiency and Analysis of Bank Internal and External Factors that Affect It. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Organisasi (JMO), 10(1), 48–62.
Mishkin, F. (2019). The_Economics_of_Money,_Bank. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Nasution, S., Siregar, H., & Novianti, T. (2020). Efficiency Analysis of Bank Bumn Buku Empat and Its Determinant in Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 18(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2020.018.01.09
Nguyen, P. H., & Pham, D. T. B. (2020). The cost efficiency of Vietnamese banks – the difference between DEA and SFA. Journal of Economics and Development, 22(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/jed-12-2019-0075
Ni?oi, M., & Spulbar, C. (2015). An Examination of Banks’ Cost efficiency in Central and Eastern Europe. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22(November 2014), 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00256-7
OJK. 2020. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 48/POJK.03/2020 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 11/POJK.03/2020 Tentang Stimulus Perekonomian Nasional Sebagai Kebijakan Countercyclical Dampak Penyebaran Coronavirus Disease 2019. Direktur Hukum 1.
OJK Statistik Perbankan Indonesia. 2020. Statistik Perbankan Indonesia - Desember 2020. Statistik Perbankan Indonesia, 19(1), 1858–4233.
OJK Statistik Perbankan Indonesia. 2022. Statistik Perbankan Indonesia - Desember 2022. Statistik Perbankan Indonesia, 1–23.
Parasari, H. A. (2020). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Efisiensi Bank Serta Pengukurannya (Studi Pada Bpd Go Public Dan Non Go Public 2011-2019). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB.
Pemerintah Indonesia. 1998.Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan. Sekretariat Negara.
Pemerintah Indonesia. 2020. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar Dalam Rangka Percepatan Penanganan Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Sekretariat Negara.
Pindyck, S. R., & Rubinfeld, L. D. (2014). MIKROEKONOMI (Kedelapan). Erlangga.
Pratiwi, N. B. (2016). Perbandingan Regresi Komponen Utama dengan Regresi Ridge untuk Mengatasi Masalah Multikolinearitas. Universitas Negeri Semarang, Fakultas Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Semarang: UNNES. http://lib. unnes. ac. id/id/eprint/26620.
Rahmah, A. Z., & Armina, S. H. (2020). Macro and micro determinants of the non-performing finance: The case of Indonesian Islamic bank. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 6(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol6.iss1.art4
Reksoprayitno, S. (2011). Pengantar Ekonomi Mikro. 143.
Sanchez, B., Hassan, M. K., & Bartkus, J. R. (2013). Efficiency Determinants and Dynamic Efficiency Changes in Latin American Banking Industries. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra: The Business and Economics Research Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7835/jcc-berj-2013-0080
Sutawijaya, A., & Lestari, E. P. (2009). Efisiensi Teknik Perbankan Indonesia Pascakrisis Ekonomi : Sebuah Studi Empiris Penerapan Model Dea. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 10(1). http://hdl.handle.net/11617/93
Umar, H. . (2009). Studi Literatur Principal Component Analysis ( PCA ). Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 3(2), 97–101.
Widiarti, A. W., Siregar, H., & Andati, T. (2015). the Determinants of Bank’S Efficiency in Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 18(2), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v18i2.520
Widyaningsih, N., & Sampurno, R. D. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Car, Nim, Bopo, Npl Dan Ldr Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Diponegoro Journal of Management, 11(2020), 1. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/dbr
World Bank. n.d. Indonesia Data. World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/country/ID
Zuhroh, I., Ismail, M., & Maskie, G. (2015). Cost Efficiency of Islamic Banks in Indonesia – A Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.150
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Habibatuz Akbaricha Putri, Ghozali Maski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Authors who publish with Journal of Economics and Business Aseanomics (JEBA) agree to the following terms:
1. For all articles published in Journal of Economics and Business Aseanomics (JEBA), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the publishing right's automatic transfer to the publisher.
3. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).