Analisis Pengaruh Dinamisme Lingkungan dan Faktor Manajerial Terhadap Perencanaan Strategis dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kinerja Organisasi Non-Profit dengan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard

Authors

  • Siti Khusnul Rifani
  • Tengku Ezni Balqiah

https://doi.org/10.33476/j.e.b.a.v6i1.1923

Keywords:

External business environmental dynamism, managerial factors, strategic planning, nonprofit organization’s performance, balanced scorecard

Abstract

External environment changes and managerial factors are important to be considered in the preparation of strategic planning. Strategic planning is very important for the organization, not only for profit organizations but also for nonprofit organizations because a formal strategic planning can guide them to assess how far their goals have been achieved and how to achieve them. This study discusses how the dynamism of the external environment and managerial factors influence strategic planning and its implications for WWF Indonesia's performance using the Balanced Scorecard approach. The research method used is to use a survey of employees at WWF Indonesia and processed with SmartPLS 3.0. The results show that external business environment dynamism and managerial factors can influence strategic planning which ultimately affects the improvement of WWF Indonesia's performance.

References

Allison, K. (2005). Perencanaan Strategis Bagi Organisasi Nirlaba. Jakarta.: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Ansoff, H. I. (1991). Critique Henry Mintzberg. The Design School : Reconsidering The Basic Premise of Strategies Management. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 449–461.

Ansoff, H. I., Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. (2001). Planning And Firm Performance Planning And Firm Performance A Synthesis Of More Than Two Decades Of Research. Academic Management Journal, 37, 1649–1665.

Bryson, J. M. (2007). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations : A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. Jossey-Bass Publisher.

C.C, M., & Cardinal, L. . (1994). Strategic Planning And Firm Performance. A Synthesis Of More Than Decades Of Research, 37(6), 1649-1665.

Franklin, P. W. (2011). Relationship Between Strategic Planning And Nonprofit Organizational Performance. Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University From Proquest Dissertations And Theses: Full Text Database. (Publication No.3440040). United States. Retrieved August.

Griggs, H. E. (2003). Corporatization Of The Not-For-Profit Sector: Strategic Planning And Organizational Performance In Disability-Based Organizations. International Journal Of Disability, Development And Education, 50(2), 197–220.

Hassan, M. S. (2010). To What Extent Do The Legal Restrictions On Non-Government Organizations In Egypt Undermine Ngos’ Ability To Achieve Their Goals? The American University In Cairo.

Hitt, M. ., Ireland, R. ., & Hoskinsson, R. . (2001). Manajemen Strategis. Daya Saing Dan Globalisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Hopkins, & Hopkins. (1997). Strategic Planning – Financial Performance Relationship In Bank ; A Causal Examination. Strategic Management Journal, 18(8), 635–652.

Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance. (Cover Story). Harvard Business Review, 87(7–8), 172–180. Retrieved from From The Business Source Premier Database.

Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2000). Having Trouble With Your Strategy? Then Map It. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 167-176. Retrieved from Retrieved Saturday, August, 20, 2011 From The Business Source Premier Database.

Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2001). Transforming The Balanced Scorecard From Performance Measurement To Strategic Management: Part Ii. Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 147–160. Retrieved from Retrieved Saturday, August, 30, 2011 From The Business Source Premier Database.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard: Business Press.

Kaplan, & Robert, S. (2005). How The Balanced Scorecard Complements The Mckinsey 7-S Model. Strategy & Leadership, 33(3), 41.

Kaplan, Robert, S., Norton, & David, P. (n.d.). Balanced Scorecard: Menerapkan Strategi Menjadi Aksi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Mintzberg, & Henry. (1993). Structure In Fives: Designing Effective Organization. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International.

Moxley, D. P. (2004). Factors Influencing The Successful Use Of Vision-Based Strategy Planning By Nonprofit Human Service Organizations. International Journal Of Organization Theory And Behavior, 7(1), 107-132.

Niven, P. R. (2008). Balanced Scorecard Step-By-Step For Government And Nonprofit Agencies (2nd Ed.). Hoboke: Nj: John Wiley And Sons.

Niven, Paul R. (2003). Balanced Scorecard Step By Step For Government And Non Profit Agencies. New Jersey: John Willey & Sons, Inc.

Porter, M. E. (2007). Strategi Bersaing; Teknik Menganalisis Industri dan Pesaing. Tangerang Selatan: Karisma Publishing Group.

Ramanathan, K. V. (1982). Management Control In Nonprofit Organizations. New York: John Wiley And Sons.

Robinson, J. H. (1992). Strategic Planning Processes Used By Not-For-Profit Community Social Service Organizations And A Recommended Strategic Planning Approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, Webster University, United States. Retrieved August, 2011, From Proquest Dissertations And Theses. United States.

Salim Ibrahim Ali, et. a. (2017). ’Legal Research of Doctrinal and Non-Doctrinal. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, 4(1), 493.

Shad, M. K., Lai, F., W., Fatt, C. L., Klemeš, J. J., & Bokhari, A. (2018). Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production. Journal of Cleaner Production, (208), 415–425.

Stirling, C., Kilpatrick, S., & Orpin, P. (2011). A Psychological Contract Perspective To The Link Between Non-Profit Organizations’ Management Practices And Volunteer Sustainability. Human Resource Development International., 14(3), 321–336.

Stone, M. M., B., B., & Crittenden, W. (1999). Research On Strategic Management In Nonprofit Organizations: Synthesis, Analysis, And Future Directions. Administration And Society, 31(3), 378–423.

Stone, M. M., & Brush, C. G. (1996). Planning In Ambiguous Contexts: The Dilemma Of Meeting Needs For Commitment And Demands For Legitimacy. Strategic Management Journal, 17(8), 633.

Tan, J. ., & R.J, L. (1994). “Environment – Strategy Relationship And Its Performance Implication : An Empirical Study Of The Chinese Electronics Industry. Strategy Management Journal”, 15, 1–20.

Van Zyl, C. & Botha, C. (2004). Motivational factors of local residents to attend the Aardklop National Arts Festival. Event Management, 8(4), 213–222.

Wheelen, L., & Hunger, J. (2008). Strategic Management And Business Policy. (11th Edition). London: Pearson International Edition.

Wuellner, M., Vincent, L., & Felts, B. E. (2017). Environmental Mental Models of College Students. International of Environmental & Science Education., 12(2), 105–116.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-22

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): JANUARI - JUNI 2021

Section

Articles

License

Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Authors who publish with Journal of Economics and Business Aseanomics (JEBA) agree to the following terms:

1. For all articles published in Journal of Economics and Business Aseanomics (JEBA), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the publishing right's automatic transfer to the publisher.

3. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

4. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).