Peran Moderasi Adaptasi Akademik pada Hubungan antara Performa Akademik dan Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia Saat PJJ
Authors
-
Muhammad Imam Shiddiq
Universitas Indonesia
-
Eva Septiana
Keywords:
College Students, Higher Education, Academic Cheating, Grade Point Average, Academic AdjustmentAbstract
Fenomena kecurangan akademik di jenjang pendidikan tinggi seperti Universitas Indonesia kenyataannya masih terjadi dengan adanya data yang menunjukkan bahwa Mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia melakukan kecurangan akademik karena berbagai faktor seperti nilai/performa akademik dan beradaptasi dengan sistem akademik perguruan tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat efek moderasi adaptasi akademik pada hubungan antara performa akademik dengan kecurangan akademik pada 350 mahasiswa program sarjana pada 14 fakultas di Universitas Indonesia selama menjalani masa pembelajaran jarak jauh (PJJ). Penelitian ini dilaksanakan secara daring dengan menggunakan Kuesioner Kecurangan Akademik, Indeks Prestasi Semester saat diberlakukannya PJJ (Genap TA. 2019/2020), dan Academic Adjustment Questionnaire. Hasil analisis Pearson Correlation dan regresi PROCESS Model 1 Hayes menunjukkan adanya hubungan negatif yang signifikan antara variable performa akademik dan variable kecurangan akademik, serta variable adaptasi akademik memiliki efek yang signifikan dalam menguatkan hubungan kedua variabel sebelumnya. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menambah wawasan masyarakat umum mengenai kecurangan akademik di Universitas Indonesia dan pengembangan penelitian terkait topik pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia.
References
Alt, D. (2015). Assessing the Connection between Self-Efficacy for Learning and Justifying Academic Cheating in Higher Education Learning Environments. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9227-5
Anderman, E. M., & Won, S. (2019). Academic Cheating in Disliked Classes. Ethics and Behavior, 29(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1373648
Ardani, M. A. D. (2014). Hubungan antara Family Functioning Academic Adjustment pada Mahasiswa Baru Universitas Indonesia [Universitas Indonesia]. https://library.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20402471&lokasi=lokal
Arnold, R., Martin, B. N., & Bigby, L. (2007). Is There a Relationship Between Honor Codes and Academic Dishonesty? Journal of College and Character, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-1639.1164
Aulia, F. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang Terkait dengan Kecurangan Akademik pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal RAP (Riset Aktual Psikologi Universitas Negeri Padang), 6(1), 23–32.
http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/psikologi/article/view/6647
Baker, R. W., & Siryk, B. (1984). Measuring Adjustment to College. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.31.2.179
Baker, R. W., & Siryk, B. (1989). SACQ: Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire. Western Psychological Services.
Cazan, A.-M., & Iacob, C. (2017). Academic Dishonesty , Personality Traits and Academic Adjustment. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Bra?ov, 10(2), 59–66. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=625214
Chen, C., Long, J., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Wang, L., & Zhang, J. (2020). Online Academic Dishonesty of College Students: A Review. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Education, Management and Social Science (AEMSS2020), 448, 156–161. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.121
Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on Tests: How to Do It, Detect It, and Prevent It. Routledge.
Credé, M., & Niehorster, S. (2012). Adjustment to College as Measured by Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire: A Quantitative with Correlates and Consequences. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10648-0 11 -9 184-5
Dekan Fakultas Kedokteran UI. (2009). Surat Keputusan Dekan FKUI No. 862/SF/D/FKUI/2009 tentang Tata Krama Kehidupan Kampus FKUI (Issue 862). Universitas Indonesia. TATA-KRama-FKUI.pdf - Universitas Indonesia pdib.fk.ui.ac.id › uploads › 2017/09
Dekan Fakultas Psikologi UI. (2017). Peraturan Dekan Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia No. 47/UN2.F8.D/HKP.01.03/2017 tentang Tata Tertib Pelaksanaan Ujian Tengah Semester dan Ujian Akhir Semester Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia. https://psikologi.ui.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/47-Peraturan-Dekan-No.-47-tentang-tata-tertib-pelaksanaan-UTS-dan-UAS-Fakultas-Psikologi-UI.pdf
Dekan Fakultas Teknik UI. (2016). Surat Keputusan Dekan FTUI Nomor 622 tentang Sanksi Akademis Bagi Pelaku Kecurangan Akademis dalam Ujian di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia. http://eng.ui.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/SK-Dekan-no-622-2016-Tentang-Sanksi-Akademis.pdf
Dvorak, T., & Jia, M. (2016). Do the Timeliness, Regularity, and Intensity of Online Work Habits Predict Academic Performance? Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.15
Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic Moderating Identification Performance Role Cheating: Identification and Self-Efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.3.115-121
Hensley, L. C., Kirkpatrick, K. M., & Burgoon, J. M. (2013). Relation of gender, course enrollment, and grades to distinct forms of academic dishonesty. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 895–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827641
Josien, L., & Broderick, B. (2013). Cheating in Higher Education: Case of Multi-Methods Cheaters. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(3), 93–105. https://www.proquest.com/openview/30184f614f75002d90d3347fe5ba7525/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=38741
Karim, S., & Ghavam, E. (2011). The Relationship between Self-control, Self-effectiveness, Academic Performance and Tendency towards Academic Cheating: A Case Report of a University Survey in Iran. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–8. http://mjde.usm.my/vol13_2_2011/mjde13_2_1.pdf
Kemendikbud RI. (2020). Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pendidikan dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran Covid-19 (p. 300). Kemendikbud RI. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/03/se-mendikbud-pelaksanaan-kebijakan-pendidikan-dalam-masa-darurat-penyebaran-covid19
Lee, J. S. (2012). The Effects of the Teacher-Student Relationship and Academic Press on Student Engagement and Academic Performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.04.006
Maguin, E., & Loeber, R. (1996). Academic Performance and Delinquency. Crime and Justice, 20, 127–128. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346750-24
Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who Cheats at University? A Self-Report Study of Dishonest Academic Behaviours in a Sample of Australian University Students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530412331283426
Mata, J. R. (2020). How to Teach Online? Recommendations for the Assessment of Online Exams with University Students in the USA in Times of Pandemic. Internationa Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 15, 188–202. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5003
McAbee, S. T., & Oswald, F. L. (2013). The Criterion-Related Validity of Personality Measures for Predicting GPA: A Meta-Analytic Validity Competition. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031748
McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2012). Cheating in College: Why Students Do It and What Educators Can Do about It. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mikami, A. Y., Szwedo, D. E., Khalis, A., Jia, M., & Na, J. J. (2019). Online Social Interactions Predict Academic and Emotional Adjustment in the Transition to University. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(1), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12377
Ogrutan, P. L., & Aciu, L. E. (2020). Aspects of Academic Performance and Ethics in the Transition to eLearning Caused by the Actual Pandemic - A Case Study. TEM Journal, 9(2), 656–661. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM92-31
Park, S. (2020). Goal Contents as Predictors of Academic Cheating in College Students. Ethics and Behavior, 30(8), 628–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019.1668275
Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2020). The Influence of Psychological, Motivational, and Behavioral Factors on University Students’ Achievements: The Mediating Effect of Academic Adjustment. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2020-0065
Rektor Universitas Indonesia. (2004). Keputusan Rektor Universitas Indonesia No. 478/SK/R/UI/2004 tentang Evaluasi Keberhasilan Studi Mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia. In Universitas Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia. https://www.sci.ui.ac.id/beta/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/SK-Rektor-478_2004_Evaluasi-Keberhasilan-Studi.pdf
Rienties, B., Beausaert, S., Grohnert, T., Niemantsverdriet, S., & Kommers, P. (2012). Understanding Academic Performance of International Students: The Role of Ethnicity, Academic and Social Integration. High Education, 63(6), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9468-1
Simatupang, R. F. O., & Saleh, A. Y. (2014). Hubungan antara Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik dan Tipe Nilai Schwartz pada Mahasiswa di Universitas Indonesia. https://library.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20402706&lokasi=lokal
Simons, J., Leverett, S., & Beaumont, K. (2020). Success of Distance Learning Graduates and The role of Intrinsic Motivation. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning, 35(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1696183
Stiles, B. L., Wong, N. C. W., & LaBeff, E. E. (2018). College Cheating Thirty Years Later: The Role of Academic Entitlement. Deviant Behavior, 39(7), 823–834.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1335520
Stone, T. H., Kisamore, J. L., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Predicting Academic Dishonesty: Theory of Planned Behavior and Personality. ASAC, 40–57. http://ojs.acadiau.ca/index.php/ASAC/article/viewFile/1203/1038
von Jena, Z. A. (2020). The Cognitive Conditions Associated with Academic Dishonesty in University Student and Its Effect on Society. UC Merced Undergraduate Research Journal, 12(1), 1–20. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/34g527n1
Waller, T. O. (2009). A Mixed Method Approach for Assessing the Adjustment of Incoming First-Year Engineering Students in a Summer Bridge Program [Virginia Polytechnic Institute]. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Mixed-Method-Approach-for-Assessing-the-of-in-a-Waller/2ee1c3b734b27a2618660bc33a46d08363c50382
Warsito, H. (2012). Hubungan Antara Self-Efficacy dengan Penyesuaian Akademik dan Prestasi Akademik. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, IX(1), 29–47. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/pedagogi/article/view/119
Watson, G., & Sottile, J. (2010). Cheating in the Digital Age: Do Students Cheat More in Online Courses? Marshall Digital Scholar, 13(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ877536
Xie, Y. J., Cao, D. P., Sun, T., & Yang, L. Bin. (2019). The Effects of Academic Adaptability on Academic Burnout, Immersion in Learning, and Academic Performance among Chinese Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1640-9
Yuliyanto, H. (2015). Persepsi Mahasiswa Tentang Ketidak-Jujuran Akademik: Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Program Vokasi Universitas Indonesia. Jurnal Vokasi Indonesia, 3(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.7454/jvi.v3i1.28
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
