Hubungan Antara Trait Kepribadian Maladaptif Manajer dan Kualitas Leader-Member Exchange: Studi Pada Manajer First line di PT X dan Bawahannya
https://doi.org/10.24854/jps.v8i2.1300
Keywords:
Kepemimpinan, trait kepribadian maladaptif, gangguan kepribadian, relasi pemimpin dan bawahan, five-factor modelAbstract
Individu dengan trait kepribadian maladaptif yang belum sampai taraf gangguan kepribadian masih bisa berfungsi, bahkan sukses dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Di lingkungan kerja, pemimpin dengan trait kepribadian maladaptif berpotensi memiliki masalah dalam hubungan interpersonal dengan rekan kerjanya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara trait kepribadian maladaptif dengan hubungan pimpinan dengan bawahannya berdasarkan pendekatan leader-member exchange (LMX). Partisipan penelitian ini adalah 72 diad atau pasangan manajer first line di PT X dengan staf yang menjadi bawahannya. Seorang manajer dapat memiliki lebih dari satu bawahan sehingga jumlah manajer hanya 21 orang. Trait kepribadian maladaptif pada manajer diukur dengan Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5 BF). Kualitas hubungan manajer tersebut dengan bawahannya diukur dengan Leader Member Exchange-Multidimensional Measure (LMX-MDM) yang diisi oleh para staf. Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa trait dari domain negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, dan psychoticism memiliki hubungan signifikan dengan LMX. Hubungan yang ditemukan bersifat negatif, sejalan dengan temuan menggunakan domain-domain trait non maladaptif pada five-factor model yang ekuivalen dengan domain-domain PID-5 BF.
References
Adhiatma, W., Pinaima, R., Siregar, L.B., Nova, P., & Kencana, K. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis for Indonesian version of PID-5. Anima, Indonesian Psychological Journal, 29 (4), 199-206.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Bagby, R. M., Quilty, L. C., Veltri, C. O., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20(3), 286-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112471141
Babiak, P. (1995). When psychopaths go to work: A case study of an industrial psychopath. Applied Psychology, 44(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01073.x
Bateman, A. W., Gunderson, J. & Mulder, R. (2015). Treatment of personality disorder. London: Barnet, Enfield, and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61394-5
Bernerth, J., Armenakis, A., Field, H., Giles, W. & Jack Walker, H. (2007). Is personality associated with perceptions of LMX? An empirical study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(7), 613-631. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710823879
Bernstein, D. P., Iscan, C., & Maser, J. (2007). Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM-IV personality disorders classification system. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(5), 536-551. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.5.536
Board, B. J., & Fritzon, K. (2005). Disordered personalities at work. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160310001634304
Dansereau, F. J., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
Ettner, S. L., Maclean, J. C., & French, M. T. (2008). Does having a dysfunctional personality hurt your career? Axis II personality disorders and labor market outcomes. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 50(1), 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2010.00629.x
Fossati, A., Somma, A., Borroni, S., Markon, K., & Krueger, R. (2015). The Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form: evidence for reliability and construct validity in a sample of community-dwelling italian adolescents. Assessment, 24(5), 615-631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115621793
Giacalone, R. A. & Greenberg, J. (eds.). (1997) Antisocial behavior in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
Goldman, A. (2006) High toxicity leadership: borderline personality disorder and the dysfunctional organization. Journal of Management Psychology, 21(8), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610713262
Goodwin, V., Bowler, W. and Whittington, J. (2008). A social network perspective on LMX relationships: Accounting for the instrumental value of leader and follower networks. Journal of Management, 35(4), 954-980. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321555
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1991). The transformation of professionals into self-managing and partially self-designing contributions: Toward a theory of leader-making. Journal of Management Systems, 3(3), 33-48. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/managementfacpub/16
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Heller, D., Judge, T. and Watson, D. (2002). The confounding role of personality and trait affectivity in the relationship between job and life satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(7), 815-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.168
Hengartner, M. P., Müller, M., Rodgers, S., Rössler, W., & Ajdacic-Gross, V. (2013). Occupational functioning and work impairment in association with personality disorder trait-scores. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49(2), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0739-2
Hogan, R. & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing Leadership: A View from the Dark Side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1&2), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00162
Judge, T. & Bono, J. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751-765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751
Judge, T & Robbins, S. P. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Essex: Pearson.
Kamphuis, J. H & Noordhof, A. (2009). On categorical diagnoses in DSM–V: cutting dimensions at useful points. Psychological Assessment. 21(3), 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016697
Kirkpatrick, S. & Locke, E. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter? Executive, 5(2), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274679
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D. & Skodol, A. E. (2013). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF). Manuscript in preparation. https://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/DSM/APA_DSM5_The-Personality-Inventory-For-DSM-5-Brief-Form-Adult.pdf
Krueger, R. F. & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
Le, K., Donnellan, M. B., & Conger, R. (2013). Personality development at work: Workplace conditions, personality changes, and the corresponsive principle. Journal of Personality, 82, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12032
Liden, R. and Maslyn, J. (1998). Multidimensionality of Leader-member exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80053-1
Nahrgang, J., Morgeson, F. and Ilies, R. (2009). The development of leader–member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 256-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.09.002
Ouimet, G. (2010). Dynamics of narcissistic leadership in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(7), 713-726. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011075265
Schilling, J., & Schyns, B. (2014). The causes and consequences of bad leadership. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 222(4), 187–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000185
Schyns, B., Maslyn, J. & van Veldhoven, M. (2012). Can some leaders have a good relationship with many followers? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(6), pp.594-606. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731211253046
Sears, G. J., & Hackett, R. D. (2011). The influence of role definition and affect in LMX: A process perspective on the personality - LMX relationship. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(3), 544–564. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X492081
Smith, M. & Canger, J. (2003). Effects of Supervisor “Big Five” Personality on Subordinate Attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4), 465-481. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBU.0000028447.00089.12
Thomas, K. M., Yalch, M. M., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G., Markon, K. E., & Hopwood, C. J. (2012). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment, 20(3), 308-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112457589
Trimpey, M. & Davidson, S. (1994). Chaos, perfectionism, and sabotage: personality disorders in the workplace. Issues in Mental Health Nursery, 15(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612849409074931
Witt, L. (2002). The interactive effects of extraversion and conscientiousness on performance. Journal of Management, 28(6), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014920630202800607
Yudofsky, S. C. (2005). Navigating destructive relationships with people with disorders of personality and character. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2006.57.4.587
Zhang, Z., Wang, M. & Shi, J. (2012). Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0865
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).