Bagaimana Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Saling Terkait? Peran Mediasi Keterlekatan Kerja

Authors

  • Ellysabeth Ayuni University of Indonesia
  • Arum Etikariena University of Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.24854/jps.v8i1.1260

Keywords:

innovative work behavior, perceived organizational support, job embeddedness, mediation

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat peran mediasi keterlekatan kerja pada hubungan antara persepsi dukungan organisasi dan perilaku kerja inovatif. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif korelasional dan data diperoleh dari 281 karyawan sebuah perusahaan milik negara di Indonesia yang sedang melakukan inovasi. Alat ukur yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah Innovative Work Behavior Scale (Janssen, 2000), Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (Neves & Eisenberger, 2014) dan Job Embeddedness Scale (Lee dkk., 2004). Pengujian hipotesis mediasi dilakukan menggunakan macro PROCESS Hayes dan ditemukan bahwa keterlekatan kerja memediasi secara penuh hubungan antara persepsi dukungan organisasi dan perilaku kerja inovatif (indirect effect = 0,139, Boot SE = 0,031, CI [0,083, 0,207]; direct effect = 0,054, Boot SE = 0,063, CI [-0,070, 0,179]). Dengan demikian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa hubungan persepsi dukungan organisasi dan perilaku kerja inovatif dimediasi oleh keterlekatan kerja.

References

Abdini, C. (October, 2019). Global innovation index di ASEAN 6.

Abid, G., Zahra, I., & Ahmed, A. (2015). Mediated mechanism of thriving at work between perceived organization support, innovative work behavior and turnover intention. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9(3), 982-998.

Afsar, B., & Badir, Y. (2017). Workplace spirituality, perceived organizational support and innovative work behavior. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(2), 95-109.

Afsar, B., & Masood, M. (2018). Transformational leadership, creative self-efficacy, trust in supervisor, uncertainty avoidance, and innovative work behavior of nurses. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(1), 36-61.

Agarwal, U. (2014). Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, 43(1), 41-73.

Agarwal, U. (2014). Examining the impact of social exchange relationships on innovative work behaviour: Role of work engagement. Team Performance Management, 20(3/4), 102-120.

Akhtar, M. W., Syed, F., Husnain, M., & Naseer, S. (2019). Person-organization fit and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of perceived organizational support, affective commitment and trust. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 13(2), 311-333.

Akilesh, A. (2018). The impact of exploitative and explorative learning on the relationship between job embeddedness and innovative work behavior. International Journal of Enhanced

Research in Management & Computer Applications, 7(3).

Alfisyahri, K., Etikariena, A., & Gatari, E. (2017, September). The relationship between perceived organizational support and employee’s turnover intention through supportive co-worker workshop in division B at Company X. In 1st International Conference on Intervention and Applied Psychology (ICIAP 2017). Atlantis Press.

Allen, D. G., & Shanock, L. R. (2013). Perceived organizational support and embeddedness as key mechanisms connecting socialization tactics to commitment and turnover among new employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(3), 350-369.

Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–67

Ansari, N. Y., Siddiqui, S. H., & Farrukh, M. (2018). Effect of high performance work practices on job embeddedness and employee innovative behavior. International Journal of ontemporary

Economics and Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 64-88.

Basu, R. (2017). Role of organizational climate: Innovative work behaviour in indian banks. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 14(1), 98-113

Bibi, A., & Jadoon, B. (2018). The mediating effect of exploitative and explorative learning on the relationship between job embeddedness and innovative work behavior. Innovation, 6(1), 1-8.

Burns, E. (2008). Southern theory perspective and career development. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17(2), 30–37.

?erne, M., Hernaus, T., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2017). The role of multilevel synergistic interplay among team mastery climate, knowledge hiding, and job characteristics in stimulating

innovative work behavior. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(2), 281-299

Coetzer, A., Inma, C., Poisat, P., Redmond, J., & Standing, C. (2018). Job embeddedness and employee enactment of innovation-related work behaviours. International Journal of Manpower, 39(2), 222-239

Dai, H., & Zhang, H. (2019). The effect of perceived organizational supports, perceived supervisory supports and perceived peer supports on innovative behavior: Focused on the job

embeddedness of Automotive Industry Research Institute using VR technology. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 24(10), 139-147.

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.

Dediu, V., Leka, S., & Jain, A. (2018). Job demands, job resources and innovative work behaviour: A european union study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(3), 310-323

Do?ru, Ç. (2018). The relationship between perceived support and innovative behavior: Analyzing the mediating role of work engagement. ??letme Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi, 10(2), 384-402

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500

Etikariena, A., & Muluk, H. (2014). Correlation between organizational memory and innovative work behavior. Makara Human Behavior Studies In Asia, 18(2), 77-88.

Etikariena, A. (2018). Perbedaan perilaku kerja inovatif berdasarkan karakteristik individu karyawan. Jurnal Psikologi, 17(2), 107-118.

George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310

George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2012). Understanding and managing organizational behavior. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Ghosh, V., Bharadwaja, M., Yadav, S., & Kabra, G. (2019). Team-member exchange and innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(3), 344-361.

Giosan, C. (2003). Antecedents of job embeddedness (Doctoral dissertation). New School for Social Research.

Haahr, M. (n.d.). True Random Number Service. Retrieved from https://www.random.org

Haider, M. H. & Akbar, A. (2017). Internal marketing and employee's innovative work behavior: The mediating tole of job embeddedness. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 291-

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

Hennessey, B.A. and Amabile, T.M. (2010) Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598.

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302

Jason, V., & Geetha, S. N. (2019). Regulatory focus and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement. Current Psychology, 1-13.

Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2005). Psychology testing: principles, applications, issues. Belmont: Thomson

Wadsworth. Karatepe, O. M. (2016). Does job embeddedness mediate the effects of coworker and family support on creative performance? An empirical study in the hotel industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 15(2), 119-132.

Karatepe, O. M. (2013). High-performance work practices, work social support and their effects on job embeddedness and turnover intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(6), 903-921.

Kementerian Perindustrian. (2010). Pertumbuhan industri melampaui target. Retrieved from https://kemenperin.go.id/download/129

Khan, M. J., Aslam, N., & Riaz, M. N. (2012). Leadership styles as predictors of innovative work behavior. Pakistan Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 9(2).

Khorakian, A., Shahroodi, H.M., Jahangir, M., & Farkhani, Z. N. (2019). Innovative work behavior in public organizations: The roles of ethical and knowledge sharing behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 31(2), 164-173

Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative

Lee, W. T., Burch, T. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (2014). The story of why we stay: A review of job embeddedness. Annual Review Organanization Psychology Organization Behavior, 1(1), 199-216.

Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 711–722.

Li, M., Liu, Y., Liu, L., & Wang, Z. (2017). Proactive personality and innovative work behavior: The mediating effects of affective states and creative self-efficacy in teachers. Current Psychology, 36(4), 697-706

Ma Prieto, I., & Pilar Pérez-Santana, M. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: The role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184-208

Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102-1121

Neves, P., & Eisenberger, R. (2014). Perceived organizational support and risk taking. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(2), 187-205.

Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). Occupational embeddedness and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(7), 863-891

Nguyen, V. Q., Taylor, G. S., & Bergiel, E. (2017). Organizational antecedents of job embeddedness. Management Research Review, 40(11), 1216-1235.

Noviyanti, S. (2019, April 12). X digisummit 2019 hadirkan inovasi dan layanan baru. Kompas.com. Retrieved from money.kompas.com

Park, Y. K., Song, J. H., Yoon, S. W., & Kim, J. (2014). Learning organization and innovative behavior: The mediating effect of work engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(1-2), 75-94

Patterson, F., Kerrin, M., & Gatto-Roissard, G. (2009). Characteristics and behaviours of innovative people in organisations. Literature review prepared for the NESTA Policy & Research Unit, 1-63

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.

Purba, D. F. (2015). Employee embeddedness and turnover intentions: Exploring the moderating effect of commute time and family embeddedness. Makara Hubs-Asia, 19(1), 51-63.

Rahimnia, F., Eslami, G., & Nosrati, S. (2019). Investigating the mediating role of job embeddedness: evidence of Iranian context. Personnel Review, 48(3), 614-630.

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698

Riggle, R. J., Edmondson, D. R., & Hansen, J. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 1027-1030

Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2019). Leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 105-124.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.

Setyaningrum, P. M. (2019, November 11). Telkom-Huawei kerja sama program inovasi teknologi 5G dan cloud. Warta Ekonomi. Retrieved from wartaekonomi.co.id

Susomrith, P., & Amankwaa, A. (2019). Relationship between job embeddedness and innovative work behaviour. Management Decision.

Teigland, R., Di Gangi, P. M., Flåten, B.-T., Giovacchini, E., & Pastorino, N. (2014). Balancing on a tightrope: Managing the boundaries of a firm-sponsored OSS community and its impact on innovation and absorptive capacity. Information and Organization, 24(1), 25–47

Yang, J. Z., Yang, D. T., & Zhao, S. D. (2011). The inner driving force of employees’ innovation in the workplace: employees’ creativity self-efficacy. Psychological Science Progress, 9, 1363-1370.

Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R. (2006). Leading change: Adapting and innovating in an uncertain world. Leadership in Action, 26(2), 3-7

Downloads

Published

09-07-2020

How to Cite

Ayuni, E., & Etikariena, A. (2020). Bagaimana Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Saling Terkait? Peran Mediasi Keterlekatan Kerja. Jurnal Psikogenesis, 8(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.24854/jps.v8i1.1260

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): Juni

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).