Pengaruh Kepribadian Tangguh terhadap Perilaku Kerja Inovatif pada Karyawan PT X

Authors

https://doi.org/10.24854/jps.v7i2.1127

Keywords:

perilaku kerja inovatif, kepribadian tangguh, regresi, perusahaan manufaktur kapal

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk melihat pengaruh kepribadian tangguh terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif pada karyawan perusahaan BUMN yang bergerak pada bidang manufaktur kapal. Sebagai BUMN, perusahaan X memiliki peranan penting untuk mendukung program kerja pemerintah, inovasi diperlukan agar dapat memproduksi barang secara efisien dengan kualitas terbaik. Terdapat 121 responden dalam penelitian ini. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan Skala Perilaku Kerja inovatif (2000) dan Dispositional Resilience Scale-15 (2007). Teknik analisis data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah korelasi Pearson Product Moment dan simple regression. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa kepribadian tangguh secara signifikan berhubungan dengan perilaku kerja inovatif (r = 0.40; p < 0.01). Dengan hasil ini, analisis lanjutan menunjukkan bahwa kepribadian tangguh memiliki pengaruh sebesar 16.6% pada munculnya perilaku kerja inovatif (R2=0.16, F(1,120)=26.44, p<0.01). Hasil tersebut memiliki arti bahwa 16.6% perilaku kerja inovatif dipengaruhi oleh kepribadian tangguh, dan 83.4% sisanya dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain.

Author Biography

Arum Etikariena, Universitas Indonesia

Psikologi Industri & Organisasi

References

Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 367-403.

Bartone, P. T., Ursano, R. J., Wright, K. M., & Ingraham, L. H. (1989). The impact of a military air disaster on the health of assistance workers: A prospective study. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 177(6), 317-328.

Bartone, P. T., Roland, R. R., Picano, J. J., & Williams, T. J. (2008). Psychological hardiness predicts success in US Army Special Forces candidates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(1), 78-81.

De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of innovation management, 10(1), 41-64

Etikariena, A., & Muluk, H. (2014). Hubungan antara Memori Organisasi dan Perilaku Inovatif Karyawan. Makara Hubs-Asia, 8(3), 77-88. DOI: 10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3463

Fox, M. L., Dwyer, D. J., & Ganster, D. C. (1993). Effects of stressful job demands and control on physiological and attitudinal outcomes in a hospital setting. Academy of Management journal, 36(2), 289-318.

Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90.

Hana, U. (2013). Competitive Advantage Achievement through Innovation and Knowledge. Journal of Competitiveness (5). 1. 88-96. DOI: 10.7441/joc.2013.01.06

Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co?workers. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 76(3), 347-364.

Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129-145.

Kanter, R. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol 10: 169-211. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press

Kobasa, S. C. (1982). The hardy personality: Toward a social psychology of stress and health. Social psychology of health and illness, 4, 3-32.

Li, N., Barrick, M. R., Zimmerman, R. D., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2014). Retaining the productive employee: The role of personality. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 347-395.

Maddi, S. R. (2006). Hardiness: The courage to grow from stresses. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(3), 160-168.

Maddi, S. (2013). Personal hardiness as the basis for resilience. In Hardiness (pp. 7-17). Springer Netherlands.

Novena, M.M.N (2013). Program intervensi untuk meningkatkan work engagement pada PT XYZ berdasarkan variabel procedural justice, psychological hardiness dan commitment to change. Tesis. Depok:Universitas Indonesia.

Roberg, L. C. (2007). Organizational empowerment and hardiness as predictors of innovativeness. (Master’s Thesis), San Jose State University, San Jose. (3436)

Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313-345.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607.

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30(3), 413-432.

Vinarski-Peretz, H., & Carmeli, A. (2011). Linking Care Felt to Engagement in Innovative Behaviors in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Psychological Conditions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5(1), 43-52.

West, M.A., and Farr, J.L. (1990) Innovation at work. In M.A. West and J.L. Farr (Eds), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3-13). Chichester, England: Wiley.

Yosephine, C. (2013). Hubungan Antara Perilaku Kerja Inovatif dan Stes kerja Pada Karyawan pada Karyawan PT X dan PT Y. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

14-02-2020

How to Cite

Etikariena, A. (2020). Pengaruh Kepribadian Tangguh terhadap Perilaku Kerja Inovatif pada Karyawan PT X. Jurnal Psikogenesis, 7(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.24854/jps.v7i2.1127

Issue

Section

Articles